President Trump has made it clear that he plans to replace Jerome Powell. Reports from CBS News show that he asked Republican lawmakers if they would support such a move. Clearly, Trump wants to have his way with the economy, and his tone indicates this is a finished decision. Trump’s leadership style has been consistent for years. He often chooses a course of action and does not reverse it, even when faced with criticism. This reflects a strong desire to appear decisive rather than cautious. Investors who have followed his policy decisions now expect him to act, regardless of what the market thinks.

This expectation has shaped investor behavior in advance. Markets no longer wait for confirmation when Trump speaks. They adjust because they believe he will follow through. Traders have seen this in trade wars and tariff fights. A replacement of Powell fits the same pattern. People expect it and are preparing for it.
Powell Does Not Truly Set Interest Rates
Trump’s main reason for removing Powell is his belief that the Fed chair is keeping interest rates too high. He often speaks as if Powell personally sets the cost of borrowing. But that is not how the system works. Powell leads the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the federal funds rate, but he does not control long-term borrowing costs.
As Investopedia explains, market demand sets most rates. Investors who buy and sell Treasury bonds decide long-term yields. Mortgage rates, corporate loans, and other credit products follow those yields. The Fed has the ability to nudge rates slightly higher or slightly lower. But the basis for the rates is based on animal spirits, and the Fed can only comment on them. What it cannot control is what global investors are willing to pay. If a Trump appointee cuts rates too aggressively, investors may demand higher yields to protect against inflation or currency losses. That would make borrowing more expensive, not cheaper, which is the opposite of what Trump wants.
Markets Have Already Priced In Trump’s Move
Many analysts warn of a market crash if Powell is replaced, but history suggests that will not happen. Investors have already priced in Trump’s behavior. Traders now use a strategy called the TACO trade, short for “Trump Always Chickens Out.”
Business Insider reports that this strategy has been used for years. Markets dip when Trump makes bold threats, then rebound when he changes course. Even if he does not reverse this decision, the pattern has trained investors to expect volatility but not a deep crash. The S&P 500 and Treasury yields moved only slightly when news broke that Powell could be fired. That shows investors believe this is another policy swing, not a major threat to economic fundamentals.
Gold Is Not a Real Hedge
Many people look to gold for protection when political risk rises, but that may be a mistake. Most gold trading today is not based on physical metal. The London Bullion Market Association reports that daily gold trading volumes are more than 100 times larger than the amount of bullion held in vaults.
This means that the price of gold depends on paper contracts, not on physical supply. Gold now acts like a synthetic financial product. If confidence in paper markets weakens, the price could fall rather than rise during a crisis. Investors who buy gold as a safe haven are trusting a market that is heavily diluted by speculation.
Bitcoin and Crypto Will Not Protect Investors
Some investors argue that Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are better hedges than gold, but that is not realistic. Bitcoin wastes massive amounts of energy processing trades, and it is too slow for global use. Other coins like Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA), Solana (SOL), and Polkadot (DOT) claim to be faster and more efficient.
But these networks still handle only thousands of trades per second, while the global dollar system clears millions every second. None of these coins can scale to the level of a world reserve currency. Their prices depend on investor confidence, which can change overnight. They remain speculative and are not suitable as protection against currency or policy risk.
The Real Risk Is Long Term
The most serious risk from replacing Powell is not an immediate market crash. It is a slow decline in the strength of the dollar. The Financial Times has reported that some foreign reserve managers are already diversifying away from U.S. Treasuries. A Fed that appears to follow politics rather than policy would accelerate this shift.
Once foreign investors begin reducing Treasury purchases, trust in the dollar as a reserve currency could weaken. That process would take years, but it would be difficult to reverse. The U.S. economy depends on global confidence in its debt markets. If that confidence fades, the dollar will lose value, even if stocks continue to rise.
Global Corporations Could Gain From a Weaker Dollar
A weaker dollar is not bad for every company. Most large U.S. corporations generate a significant portion of their revenue overseas. Their price-earnings ratios stay stable because they depend on global profits, not only U.S. sales. When the dollar weakens, foreign earnings translate into more dollars, which boosts reported profits.
Technology and Brands benefit from this trend. The growth of artificial intelligence adds to it. McKinsey reports that AI adoption could add trillions of dollars to global GDP. Companies that build or use AI tools will grow quickly even if traditional industries like autos struggle. Stocks may rise in sectors tied to global trade and AI, even while the domestic economy faces long-term problems.

Artificial Rate Cuts Could Backfire
If a Trump-appointed Fed chair forces rate cuts, it could damage bond markets. Lower rates might push stocks higher in the short term, but they would reduce confidence in U.S. Treasury debt. Investors would demand higher yields to offset the risk of inflation or currency loss.
The Congressional Budget Office warns interest payments are the fastest-growing part of federal spending. Higher yields will balloon the debt while decreasing GDP. Stocks might keep rising in nominal dollars, but the real value of U.S. investor wealth has already left its 50 year sweet spot. Baby boomers would be hit hardest because they are beyond their earning years, and their retirement savings depend on stable bond markets. The real damage will be a long and grinding stagflation that will erode savings and lower middle-class wealth.
Conclusion
Firing Powell will not cause a sudden crash. Markets expect Trump to act, and they have priced in his unpredictable style. But the long-term effects could be serious. A weaker dollar, higher debt costs, and slower economic growth could leave U.S. investors poorer in real terms, even as stock prices climb. The real danger is not in falling indexes but in rising numbers that buy less each year.